Tailored MandatesAsymmetric AdvantageMath and Magic
A traditional VC fund is pooled: designed for a market, not for any one investor. Its sector, geography, pace and governance are fixed at first close to reconcile multiple mandates. You gain venture exposure, but little ability to direct it towards the priorities that matter most to your institution.
That leaves your strategic advantage outside the fund. Your domain knowledge, industry networks, procurement pathways and market view sit outside the investment process, precisely where they could create the most value. Building in-house restores control, but demands specialist talent, systems and governance that are expensive to build and hard to sustain.
A tailored mandate is Artesian's Venture Capital as a Service (VCaaS) in practice: our execution built around your thesis. As the only investor, you set the objectives, mandate and deployment pace, with participation in governance and full transparency across decisions. We provide global sourcing, diligence, execution and portfolio support, proven across more than 600 investments since 2010.
Your insight makes the capital smarter. Our infrastructure turns that insight into an enduring investment capability: aligned with your objectives, without the compromises of a traditional pooled fund or the burden of building one alone.
Own the mandate, set the pace, & put dedicated VC capability behind the strategy you choose.
Discuss a mandate→Dedicated funds
Venture capability on demand
Three ways to engage. Each structured so you maintain flexibility and control.
Full mandate flexibility. Pure financial performance.
For capital allocators, a sole-LP venture fund provides what pooled funds cannot: full flexibility over mandate and deployment. You define sector, geography, stage and concentration, and adjust as markets evolve. The strategy is set by you and can evolve over time, without the need to align with other LPs or accommodate competing priorities. Deployment pace, portfolio construction and follow-on decisions are yours, with full transparency and optional IC participation. Liquidity events can be recycled into successive vintages, enabling a compounding, evergreen allocation. Where pooled funds provide exposure, a sole-LP fund provides precision and control.
VC infrastructure for institutional mandates
Venture Capital as a Service (VCaaS). Turn-key infrastructure that gives institutions a fully operational VC capability from day one.
Artesian has built the platform so you don't have to. Fund structuring, legal frameworks, investment processes, portfolio systems, compliance, reporting.
Everything an institutional venture programme requires, already built, already running, already proven across thirteen mandates.
The platform is modular. Take all of it or part of it:
- ▸A dedicated sole-LP fund, operational from launch
- ▸Back-office infrastructure for emerging or external managers
- ▸Individual capabilities accessed on demand
You define the mandate.
We operate it.
The asymmetric advantage of collaborative venture
VCaaS in practice
Government, corporate, industry and institutional backers. Each mandate purpose-built. All operated on the same infrastructure.
Select a mandate to read the case study.
Interested in building a dedicated venture capability for your organisation?
Discuss a mandate→Frequently asked questions
What is a sole-LP venture fund?+
A sole-LP venture fund is a dedicated fund backed by a single institution. Unlike pooled venture funds, the mandate is not shared or diluted. The backer defines the strategy, and the fund is built entirely around their objectives, whether financial, strategic, or both.
How is this different from a traditional VC fund?+
Traditional VC funds pool capital from multiple investors and invest to a blended mandate. A sole-LP fund is purpose-built for one institution, allowing full control over sector focus, deployment pace, concentration, and outcomes. There is no consensus drag or competing investor priorities.
What is VCaaS (Venture Capital as a Service)?+
VCaaS is a model where a specialist manager builds and operates a venture platform on behalf of an institution. It provides end-to-end capability, sourcing, diligence, execution, and portfolio management, without the institution needing to build an internal VC team.
When does VCaaS make more sense than building an internal venture team?+
VCaaS is typically more effective when speed, access, and execution matter. Building an internal team takes time, requires specialised talent, and often lacks early deal flow. VCaaS provides immediate capability, established networks, and institutional-grade processes from day one.
Is this just corporate venture capital (CVC)?+
No. Traditional CVC teams often sit inside the organisation and can be constrained by internal processes and incentives. A VCaaS model operates as an independent venture platform, aligned to the institution's objectives but able to move at market speed and with venture discipline.
Can a sole-LP fund deliver both financial and strategic returns?+
Yes. The structure allows capital to be aligned to real industry demand while still targeting strong financial outcomes. Strategic value, such as technology adoption, partnerships, or supply chain resilience, can be built into the mandate without compromising investment discipline.
What types of institutions is this model suited for?+
This model is suited to institutions with a clear domain of interest or strategic exposure, such as governments, corporates, industry bodies, and long-term asset owners. It is particularly effective where venture can accelerate innovation, capability, or market development.
How much control does the backer retain?+
The backer defines the mandate and governance framework upfront. This can include investment committee participation, reporting requirements, and strategic priorities. The manager executes within that mandate, ensuring both discipline and alignment.
How flexible is the investment strategy over time?+
The mandate provides structure, but the execution remains flexible. This allows the fund to adapt to technology shifts, market cycles, and emerging opportunities, without losing alignment to the core objective.
What does 'not pooled, not averaged, not diluted' actually mean?+
It means your capital is not combined with other investors with different objectives. Every investment decision is made in the context of your mandate, ensuring full alignment between strategy, deployment, and outcomes.
How does this improve access to deal flow?+
A dedicated mandate allows for deeper sector focus and stronger relationships within that ecosystem. Combined with an active venture platform, this leads to earlier access to relevant opportunities and more consistent pipeline quality.
What role does the institution play beyond capital?+
Institutions can contribute domain expertise, networks, and pathways to adoption. This can include pilot opportunities, procurement channels, partnerships, or later-stage capital, helping portfolio companies move from innovation to real-world deployment.
What are the risks of this model?+
The primary risk is misalignment between mandate and execution. This is addressed through clear mandate design, governance, and disciplined portfolio construction. As with all venture investing, outcomes are driven by a small number of high-performing companies.
Is this model suitable for first-time venture investors?+
Yes. VCaaS is often used by institutions entering venture for the first time. It provides a structured way to participate, with professional management, defined governance, and the ability to build internal understanding over time.
How does this compare to investing in external VC funds?+
Investing in external funds provides exposure, but limited control or alignment. A sole-LP fund allows you to own the mandate, shape the portfolio, and align investments directly with your strategic or sector priorities.